The curious role of the “secular media”

When the long awaited spectacular judgment came in Matto case,everybody praised the media for doing the perfect vigilante job of keeping the case alive and “correct” the judgment, they are doing also a fantastic job of keeping the Jessica lal murder case alive.

But it gets curious simply because

Matto case first acquittal to the accused,
The Judge says
“Though I know he is the man who committed the crime, I acquit him, giving him the benefit of the doubt”
In the SAR Geelani judgment acquittal
The Judge puts it on record
“The court acquits the accused due to lack of evidence,but his conduct during the incident was not entirely honorable”

Can you tell me the difference between the two statements? Not much because if the Delhi police had not buckled in front of political pressure from the congress,this Geelani scum should have been rightly hanged.

Where is the media? Why is it not pursuing this case? Is it because he is “muslim and secular” the answer is out there?